We apologize for the inconvenience

Monday, August 30, 2004

Sure to show up in a future edition of Trivial Pursuit

Unfortunately I didn’t get to see it happen, but my brother will know why I was particularly interested to note that when Hicham El Guerrouj of Morocco won gold medals at the Olympics in both the 1500 meters and 5000 meters, he was only the second person to do it, and that the previous winner was the Flying Finn, Paavo Nurmi, in 1924. El Guerrouj himself was quoted as saying that when he showed up at the stadium for the 5000, he was thinking of Nurmi.

Posted at 12:53 PM
Link to this entry || 2 comments

Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Vacation snapshots from Mars

Yes, it has been very quiet here recently. Vacations are a wonderful thing. Vacations with no way to get on the net even more so.

Laura and I spent a week down the shore with her family. I took my camera. Some of the photos I shot look like holiday snapshots. These are some of the ones that didn’t.

Concentric circles, kind of greyish looking

The first set is mostly from the Cape May lighthouse, with one shot coming from the end of the street in Stone Harbor where we were staying.

Framed water?

The second set is from our trip on the Cape May-to-Lewes ferry across Delaware Bay. We spent a wonderful day wandering around Lewes and Rehoboth Beach, but I didn’t take any pictures in Delaware, just on the ferry going back and forth.

I spent the latter part of the week in Ohio at a conference, while Laura stayed at the beach with her family. I didn’t take any photos in Ohio, though. And now we’re back home. I have one more set of photos to post from our time at the shore, a project Laura and I did one evening, but probably won’t get to it until next week or so.

Posted at 10:15 PM
Link to this entry

Thursday, August 12, 2004

A man, a plan, a canal, no more Bush

John Kerry has a one-point plan for a better America:

Delivering the central speech of his 10-day "Solution For America" bus campaign tour Monday, Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry outlined his one-point plan for a better America: the removal of George W. Bush from the White House.

"If I am elected in November, no inner-city child will have to live in an America where George Bush is president," Kerry said, addressing a packed Maize High School auditorium. "No senior citizen will lie awake at night, worrying about whether George Bush is still the chief executive of this country. And no American--regardless of gender, regardless of class, regardless of race--will be represented by George Bush in the world community."

Works for me.

Why is it that humor sources like The Onion and The Daily Show give the real news more clearly than "legitimate" news sources? (Found via Backup Brain.)

Posted at 1:31 AM
Link to this entry || 1 comment

Sunday, August 8, 2004

Incompetence or just politics?

When I make my rounds of the blogs listed at the right, my first stop is usually my brother’s blog. He noted a Reuters report about the unmasking of a double agent within al Qaeda and how it was a big security screw up. My brother described it as incompetence. While that’s certainly a possibility, my immediate reaction was that it also might have been the result of political calculations by a White House that sees the entire world through the prism of domestic politics. The announcement of the capture of an al Qaeda operative in Pakistan was timed to coincide with John Kerry’s speech at the Democratic National Convention, despite his having been captured days earlier. One result of this capture was the announcement by Tom Ridge of a raising of the terror color code alert. There was much speculation that this was an example of the administration "wagging the dog" to boost the President’s sagging approval ratings. So the administration was compelled to produce evidence that there was something behind this raising of the alert. So they told the media that there was someone else being held by Pakistan who was another source of current information. The New York Times did some actual reporting and came up with his name, which a "senior Bush administration figure" helpfully confirmed. Unfortunately, this person had been turned by Pakistan and was being run as a double agent, much the way German spies in World War II had been captured by the British and then used to gather intelligence from the Germans and feed them incorrect information. It’s classic spycraft. So now al Qaeda knows that this guy has been compromised, destroying his ability to act as a double agent. Oops! Incompetence? Or another example of the Bush administration’s ability to shoot U.S. national security in the foot in return for short term domestic political gain?

Noted academic expert on political Islam Juan Cole lays out how it could have happened (found via Change for America):

So one scenario goes like this. Bush gets the reports that Eisa al-Hindi had been casing the financial institutions, and there was an update as recently as January 2004 in the al-Qaeda file. So this could be a live operation. If Bush doesn’t announce it, and al-Qaeda did strike the institutions, then the fact that he knew of the plot beforehand would sink him if it came out (and it would) before the election. So he has to announce the plot. But if he announces it, people are going to suspect that he is wagging the dog and trying to shore up his popularity by playing the terrorism card. So he has to be able to give a credible account of how he got the information. So when the press is skeptical and critical, he decides to give up Khan so as to strengthen his case. In this scenario, he or someone in his immediate circle decides that a mere double agent inside al-Qaeda can be sacrificed if it helps Bush get reelected in the short term.

A White House capable of exposing one of its own CIA operatives to try and punish one of their critics may just be capable of doing the same thing again. But, as Cole points out, it also could just be stupidity. Maybe my brother is right.

Either way, these people are unfit to lead. I don’t see how anyone can claim that this administration is strong on the war on terror. They may be strong on inducing terror in the American public, but that’s about it. In a just world, Bush would have been impeached, convicted, and evicted ages ago.

Posted at 4:34 AM
Link to this entry || 1 comment

This site is copyright © 2002-2024, Ralph Brand